← Back to IAS Mains 2018 · Essays Solved
← Back to IAS Mains 2018 · Essay-1
| Next → IAS Mains 2018 · Essay-3
🟦 IAS Mains 2018 — Essay 2
“A people that value its privileges above its principles lose both.”
Tagline: When Comfort Silences Conscience, Freedom Fades
🟧 1. Fodder Seeds — Strategic Brainstorm Points 💡
Privileges = benefits, rights, power, comforts gained from systems
Principles = values, ethics, constitutional morality, justice
Privileges without principles breed entitlement
Short-term gains vs long-term legitimacy
Moral compromise hollows institutions from within
Rights survive only when duties are respected
Erosion of principles invites authoritarianism
Corruption trades values for advantage
Societies decay when convenience replaces conscience
Loss of trust precedes loss of freedom
🟦 2. Indian Constitutional & Civilisational Seeds 🇮🇳
Indian Constitution:
- Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
Constitutional morality (Ambedkar):
- Democracy needs ethics, not just structures
Fundamental Duties:
- Balancing rights with responsibility
Freedom struggle:
- Sacrifice over comfort
Gandhi:
- Means define ends
Rule of law over rule of convenience
🟥 3. Global Philosophical & Historical Seeds 🌍
Edmund Burke:
- Society held by moral contract
Alexis de Tocqueville:
- Tyranny of majority
American Revolution:
- Liberty rooted in principles
Fall of Rome:
- Decay of civic virtue
Hannah Arendt:
- Banality of moral compromise
Privileges unchecked lead to decay
🟩 4. Governance, Society & GS Seeds 🏛️
Corruption as pursuit of privilege
Crony capitalism
Weak institutions when principles bend
Freedom of speech traded for comfort
Welfare populism vs fiscal responsibility
Shortcuts in governance undermine legitimacy
Democratic backsliding globally
🟪 5. Quick UPSC Revision Seeds 📌
Privileges endure only through principles
Ethics safeguard freedoms
Comfort can coexist with conscience—not replace it
Rights demand responsibility
Principles are democracy’s backbone
🌳 ESSAY TREE — UPSC STRUCTURE MAP
I. Introduction
Freedom lost softly, not suddenly.
II. Defining Privileges and Principles
Conceptual clarity.
III. Why People Choose Privileges
Fear, greed, convenience.
IV. Consequences of Moral Compromise
Institutional decay.
V. Indian Context
Constitutional values vs populism.
VI. Global Lessons
Civilisational decline examples.
VII. Role of Citizens and Institutions
Vigilance, accountability.
VIII. Restoring Balance
Reasserting principles.
IX. Contemporary Relevance
Digital age, social contracts.
X. Conclusion
Principles as protectors of freedom.
🟦 IAS MAINS 2018 — ESSAY–2
“A people that value its privileges above its principles lose both.”
Introduction
History rarely records the collapse of societies as sudden events. More often, freedom erodes quietly when people trade ethical principles for immediate comfort and convenience. Privileges—rights, benefits, power, and material advantages—are the visible fruits of a social order, while principles—justice, integrity, equality, and rule of law—are its roots. When a society begins to value its privileges above its principles, it undermines the very foundation that sustains those privileges. Eventually, both are lost.
Understanding Privileges and Principles
Privileges represent advantages conferred by social, political, or economic systems—civil rights, economic opportunities, social security, or political influence. Principles, on the other hand, are the moral and ethical norms that legitimise these systems: fairness, accountability, equality before law, and respect for human dignity.
Privileges without principles transform rights into entitlements. Principles without social application remain abstract ideals. A healthy society ensures harmony between the two, recognising that privileges exist because principles are upheld.
Why Societies Drift Toward Privileges
Human behaviour often gravitates toward short-term gain over long-term integrity. Fear, convenience, greed, and insecurity make people compromise principles for immediate benefits. Societies facing economic stress, political uncertainty, or external threats may accept moral shortcuts in exchange for stability or prosperity.
Democracies are particularly vulnerable to this drift. Citizens may tolerate corruption, erosion of freedoms, or discrimination as long as personal privileges remain intact. This silence normalises deviation and emboldens institutional decay.
Consequences of Valuing Privilege Over Principle
When principles are compromised, institutions hollow from within. Corruption becomes systemic rather than exceptional. Rule of law gives way to rule by discretion. Merit is replaced by favour, and trust in governance erodes.
Social cohesion suffers as inequality widens. Privileges once justified by shared values appear arbitrary and illegitimate. Those excluded lose faith in the system, while those included grow defensive and insecure. Ultimately, instability replaces order.
History offers stern lessons. The decline of ancient republics, including Rome, followed the erosion of civic virtue. When public office became a means of privilege rather than service, democratic norms collapsed. The loss of principles preceded the loss of freedom.
Indian Constitutional Context
India’s Constitution places principles at the centre of national life—justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar warned that democracy is not merely a form of government but a mode of associated living rooted in constitutional morality.
Yet challenges persist. Corruption, identity politics, and populism sometimes prioritise electoral or economic privilege over institutional integrity. Fundamental Rights divorced from Fundamental Duties weaken democratic balance. When freedoms are exercised without responsibility, democracy becomes fragile.
The freedom struggle itself stands as a contrast. It was not driven by privilege but by sacrifice and adherence to principles. That moral capital lent legitimacy to independence and constitutional governance.
Global and Contemporary Resonance
Globally, democratic backsliding reflects the same pattern. Surveillance accepted for convenience, liberties surrendered for security, and truth compromised for narrative control illustrate how privileges can seduce societies into moral compromise.
Hannah Arendt’s insight into the “banality of evil” reminds us that the erosion of principles often occurs through ordinary compliance, not dramatic villainy. When comfort silences conscience, injustice proliferates quietly.
Role of Citizens and Institutions
A society retains freedom only through vigilance. Citizens must resist the temptation to protect personal privileges at the cost of collective ethics. Institutions—judiciary, free press, civil services—must function independently to uphold principles even when unpopular.
Education plays a critical role in cultivating civic virtue. Democracies endure when citizens value fairness over favoritism and long-term justice over short-term gain.
Restoring the Balance
Privileges regain legitimacy when anchored in principles. Transparency, accountability, and ethical leadership reconnect power with purpose. Societies must periodically reaffirm values through public discourse, institutional reform, and civic participation.
True prosperity lies not in protecting exclusive advantages but in nurturing inclusive and just systems.
Conclusion
Privileges are visible and immediate; principles are quiet and enduring. History shows that when societies choose comfort over conscience, they do not safeguard privilege—they erode it. Principles are not obstacles to freedom; they are its guardians.
A people who remember this truth preserve both their privileges and their liberty. Those who forget it lose both—first morally, and then irrevocably.
🟨 SPIN-OFF ESSAY
When Privilege Outruns Principle: The Silent Erosion of Freedom
Civilisations rarely collapse under external assault alone; more often, they decay from within. The warning that a people that value its privileges above its principles lose both captures this slow moral erosion. Privileges—rights, comforts, advantages—are sustained only so long as societies remain faithful to the principles that justify them. When convenience replaces conscience and benefit displaces belief, freedom begins to wither quietly.
Privileges and Principles: A Fragile Compact
Privileges are the visible rewards of social organisation—political rights, economic opportunities, social security, and access to power. Principles, however, are the invisible glue: justice, fairness, accountability, equality, and rule of law. One is tangible; the other is foundational.
A society thrives when privileges remain accountable to principles. But when privileges come to be treated as entitlements detached from ethical responsibility, the social contract weakens. Rights without duties become claims without legitimacy.
Why Societies Trade Principles for Privilege
Human behaviour often favours immediate gain over abstract values. Fear of instability, desire for comfort, and pursuit of advantage tempt people to tolerate ethical compromises. Citizens may accept corruption, censorship, or discrimination as long as their own benefits remain intact.
Democracies are especially susceptible. Unlike authoritarian regimes that suppress dissent overtly, democracies decay when citizens voluntarily surrender vigilance. Silence, not repression, becomes the instrument of decline.
The erosion rarely feels dramatic. It masquerades as pragmatism.
The Institutional Cost of Moral Compromise
Once principles weaken, institutions decay. Corruption ceases to be a deviation and becomes routine. Rule of law bends toward discretion. Merit erodes under patronage. Trust—essential for governance—disappears.
Privileges sustained by force rather than fairness provoke resentment. Those excluded question legitimacy; those included defend advantage anxiously. Social cohesion fractures, and stability proves illusory.
History bears witness. The Roman Republic hollowed itself by turning public offices into private privileges. Democratic forms survived briefly, but freedom did not.
Indian Context: Constitutional Warnings
India’s Constitution recognises this danger. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar emphasised constitutional morality—the idea that democratic institutions survive only when citizens internalise ethical restraint. Liberty without responsibility invites chaos; authority without accountability invites tyranny.
The freedom struggle underscored this truth. Independence was won not through privilege, but through sacrifice anchored in principle. That moral capital legitimised democracy. Forgetting it risks hollowing democratic institutions without dismantling their forms.
Modern Manifestations of the Trade-Off
In contemporary societies, the trade-off appears subtle yet pervasive:
- Surveillance accepted for convenience
- Free speech diluted for social comfort
- Inequality tolerated for economic growth
Hannah Arendt’s concept of the “banality of evil” reminds us that injustice often succeeds through ordinary compliance rather than dramatic wrongdoing. Privilege dulls moral alertness.
Citizens as Guardians of Principle
No constitution can save a people unwilling to defend its principles. Institutions matter, but civic ethics matter more. Citizens must resist the temptation to protect personal advantage at the expense of collective justice.
Education, free media, and independent institutions help, but they function only when supported by an ethically conscious public. Democracies survive through active moral participation, not passive enjoyment of rights.
Re-Anchoring Privilege in Principle
Privileges endure only when they remain justified. Transparency restores legitimacy. Accountability revitalises trust. Ethical leadership reconnects power with purpose.
Societies must periodically reaffirm their values—not rhetorically, but institutionally. True freedom lies not in clinging to advantage, but in sustaining justice.
Conclusion
Privileges are attractive precisely because they are immediate; principles are demanding because they restrain desire. Yet history teaches that abandoning principles does not safeguard privilege—it destroys it.
A people that remembers this truth preserves both freedom and fairness. A people that forgets it may enjoy comfort briefly, but loses its liberty forever.
← Back to IAS Mains 2018 · Essays Solved
← Back to IAS Mains 2018 · Essay-1
| Next → IAS Mains 2018 · Essay-3